Repository logo
Research Outputs
Projects
People
Statistics
  1. Home
  2. HSG CRIS
  3. HSG Publications
  4. Predicting and Explaining Assessment Center Judgments: A Cross‐Validated Behavioral Approach to Performance Judgments in Interpersonal Assessment Center Exercises
Details

Predicting and Explaining Assessment Center Judgments: A Cross‐Validated Behavioral Approach to Performance Judgments in Interpersonal Assessment Center Exercises

Journal
Human Resource Management
ISSN
1099-050X
Type
journal article
Date Issued
2024-11-27
Author(s)
Eric Grunenberg
;
Clemens Stachl  
;
Simon M. Breil
;
Philipp Schäpers
;
Mitja D. Back
DOI
10.1002/hrm.22252
Abstract
<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Although Assessment Center (AC) role‐play assessments have received ample attention in past research, their reliance on actual behavioral information is still unclear. Uncovering the behavioral basis of AC role‐play assessments is, however, a prerequisite for the optimization of existing and the development of novel automated AC procedures. This work provides a first data‐driven benchmark for the behavioral prediction and explanation of AC performance judgments. We used machine learning models trained on behavioral cues (<jats:italic>C</jats:italic> = 36) to predict performance judgments in three interpersonal AC exercises from a real‐life high‐stakes AC (selection of medical students, <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 199). Three main findings emerged: First, behavioral prediction models showed substantial predictive performance and outperformed prediction models representing potential judgment biases. Comparisons with in‐sample results revealed overfitting of traditional approaches, highlighting the importance of out‐of‐sample evaluations. Second, we demonstrate that linear combinations of behavioral cues can be strong predictors of assessors' judgments. Third, we identified consistent exercise‐specific patterns of individual cues and cross‐exercise consistent behavioral patterns of behavioral dimensions and interpersonal strategies that were especially predictive of the assessors' judgments. We discuss implications for future research and practice.</jats:p>
Refereed
yes
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
64
Number
2
Start page
423
End page
445
URL
https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/handle/20.500.14171/121444
Support
HSG researchers can find instructions here for adding or importing publications (DOI, ORCID). Please send questions to alexandria@unisg.ch

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify