This item is non-discoverable
Barbara Burkhard
Former Member
22 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 22
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Interplay Between Affective Trait and State Diversity on Team Learning and Performance; ; - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Algorithmic Facial Expression Analysis: A Novel Methodology to Advance Management Research on EmotionsWith the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence technologies, algorithmic facial expression analysis (AFEA) has emerged as a promising methodology to measure emotions. Despite rapid adoption across management subfields, however, the full scope of AFEA’s theoretical potential remains underexplored. This paper provides a framework that links the AFEA measurement innovation to major opportunities for theoretical advancement around emotions in organizations. We start by describing the methodological basis of AFEA and reviewing its applications in management research to date. We then outline two core capabilities of AFEA—namely, capturing the temporal structure of emotions and detecting inauthentic expressions of emotions—and illustrate how these capabilities can enable theory advancement in management research. After presenting an empirical demonstration of AFEA’s capabilities and a practical step-by-step guide for using it, we conclude by discussing key considerations for realizing the future potential of AFEA research.Type:journal articleJournal:Academy of Management JournalVolume:forthcoming - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Research: How to Close the Gender Gap in Startup Financing(2024-04-12); ; - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Heuristics in Organizations: Toward an Integrative Process Model(2024-06-27); ; Christopher BinghamHeuristics play an important role in organizational decision-making. Although management and organizational scholars have contributed significantly to our understanding of heuristics in organizations over the past seven decades, the literature has become fragmented over time. Three parallel streams of research—(1) heuristics and biases, (2) fast-and-frugal heuristics, and (3) simple rule heuristics—have emerged with somewhat conflicting views on the origins, use, and implications of heuristics. Despite their shared focus, these research streams tend to ignore or decry one another and operate in isolated camps. The purpose of our review is to integrate three largely disconnected streams to provide a more holistic view of heuristics in organizations. To do so, we review and synthesize the literature and put forward an integrative process model of heuristics in organizations. The model suggests that management and organizational researchers should pay closer attention to (a) the emergence of individual-level heuristics, (b) the conversion of individual-level heuristics to the organizational level, and (c) the evolution of an organization’s portfolio of heuristics. Based on this novel process model, we set forth a fresh agenda for future research.Type:journal articleJournal:Academy of Management AnnalsScopus© Citations 22 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The Heuristics and Biases of Top Managers: Past, Present, and Future(2023); ; Riikka M. SaralaPsychology‐grounded research on heuristics and biases in decision making has become increasingly influential in the field of management studies. However, although this line of inquiry is recognized as a valuable perspective for advancing understanding of decision processes in the upper echelons of firms, extant research remains unbalanced, the bulk of previous endeavours having been focused on managerial overconfidence, with insights from more recent dual‐process theory and ecological rationality conceptions of heuristics less explored. This introductory article to the special issue of the Journal of Management Studies, entitled ‘the heuristics and biases of top managers: Past, present, and future’, offers a reflective review of prior work addressing its focal theme and places the articles incorporated into the special issue within this broader context. In addition, it sets out a number of directions for future work, with a view to inspiring the continuing advancement of conceptual and empirical knowledge and management practice.Type:journal articleJournal:Journal of Management StudiesVolume:60Issue:5Scopus© Citations 59 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Entrepreneurs' Gender on their Access to Bank Finance(2023-10); ; Scopus© Citations 38 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained: A Meta-Analysis of CEO Overconfidence, Strategic Risk Taking, and Performance(Sage Publ., 2022-07-21); ; ; ; Shepherd, Dean A.Type:journal articleJournal:Journal of ManagementScopus© Citations 110 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, A Meta-Analytic Approach to Understanding the Effects of CEO Overconfidence on Firm Performance(2018-08-15); ; ; Type:journal articleJournal:Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Meta-analytic Review on Overconfident and Overoptimistic Entrepreneurs(2019-08-12)Type:conference paper - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The Effect of Team Affective Trait Composition and Affective States on Team Learning and Performance(2019-08-12); ;
- «
- 1 (current)
- 2
- 3
- »