This item is non-discoverable
Nicola Staub
Former Member
Last Name
Staub
First name
Nicola
Email
nicola.staub@unisg.ch
Phone
+41 71 224 33 18
5 results
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Governance Mechanisms in Digital Platform Ecosystems: Addressing the Generativity-Control TensionDigital platform owners repeatedly face paradoxical design decisions with regard to their platforms’ generativity and control, requiring them to facilitate co-innovation whilst simultaneously retaining control over third-party complementors. To address this challenge, platform owners deploy a variety of governance mechanisms. However, researchers and practitioners currently lack a coherent understanding of what major governance mechanisms platform owners rely on to simultaneously foster generativity and control. Conducting a structured literature review, we connect the fragmented academic discourse on governance mechanisms with each aspect of the generativity-control tension. Next to providing avenues for prospective digital platform research, we elaborate on the double-sidedness of governance mechanisms in fostering both generativity and control.Type:journal articleJournal:Communications of the Association for Information Systems (CAIS)Volume:51Issue:1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Acquisition of Complementors as a Strategy for Evolving Digital Platform Ecosystems(Kelley School of Business, 2021-12); ; ; ; Magan, AdolfoType:journal articleJournal:MIS Quarterly ExecutiveVolume:20Issue:4 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Taxonomy of Digital Platforms: A Business Model Perspective(2021); ; ; Digital platforms (DPs) – technical core artifacts augmented by peripheral third-party complementary resources – facilitate the interaction and collaboration of different actors through highly-efficient resource matching. As DPs differ significantly in their configurations and applications, it is important from both a descriptive and a design perspective to define classes of DPs. As an intentionally designed artifact, every classification pursues a certain purpose. In this research, the purpose is to classify DPs from a business model perspective, i.e. to identify DP clusters that each share a similar business model type. We follow Nickerson et al.’s (2013) method for taxonomy development. By validating the conceptually derived design dimensions with ten DP cases, we identify platform structure and platform participants as the major clustering constituent characteristics. Building on the proposed taxonomy, we derive four DP archetypes that follow distinct design configurations, namely business innovation platforms, consumer innovation platforms, business exchange platforms and consumer exchange platforms.Type:conference paper - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Evolution of B2B Platform Ecosystems: What Can Be Learned from Salesforce?(2021); ; ; ; Magan, AdolfoType:conference paper