Revital Ludewig
Title
Dr.
Last Name
Ludewig
First name
Revital
Email
revital.ludewig@unisg.ch
Phone
+41 71 224 2115
85 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 85
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Kindesanliegen: Strategien bei der richterlichen Entscheidfindung(Konsumenteninfo AG, 2021-05); ; - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Wird das Kind sexuell missbraucht?
Glaubhaftigkeitsbegutachtung von KindernType:journal articleJournal:Kinderärztliche PraxisVolume:89Issue:2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Zwischen Urteil und Vorurteil: Nationalität als Einflussfaktor?Type:journal articleJournal:Betrifft JustizIssue:132 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Richterliche und behördliche Entscheidungsfindung zwischen Kindeswohl und Elternwohl : Erziehungsfähigkeit bei Familien mit einem psychisch kranken Elternteil(Stämpfli, 2015-08-16); - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Werden die Bedürfnisse von Opfern durch das Recht gedeckt? : Würdigung aus rechtspsychologischer SichtType:journal articleJournal:Haftung und VersicherungIssue:2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Das richterliche Auftreten vor Gericht: Distanz oder Nähe?Type:journal articleJournal:Betrifft JUSTIZVolume:29Issue:116 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Distanz oder Nähe - Wie soll man als Richterin oder Richter im Prozess auftreten?Type:journal articleJournal:Justice - Justiz - GiustiziaIssue:07.03.2012 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Einflussfaktoren bei Entscheidungen von Staatsanwälten:Are prosecutors influenced in their decisions and if so, are they aware of it? Swiss prosecutors (N = 179) responded to this question in a two-part study in forensic psychology. In the first part, they completed a questionnaire on the extent to which they are consciously aware of factors that influence their decisions. In the second part, they responded to vignettes of offenses with and without moral dilemmas. Prosecutors indicated whether these factors influenced their decisions and particularly, whether offenses with and without moral dilemmas had a different effect on the severity of punishment. The results confirm that "legally legitimate" factors such as "prior criminal record" and the "severity of the offense" strongly influence prosecutors while factors that are "not legally legitimate" such as "sex" and "nationality" of the accused have less of an influence on prosecutor’s decision-making. Their awareness of the differences between legally mandate factors and ethically biasing factors can be observed in how these factors were rated to influence their own and their colleagues’ decision-making. Prosecutors rated that they were more influenced by legally appropriate factors than their colleagues were. Conversely, their colleagues’ decisions were more influenced by non-legitimate biasing factors than their own. Increasing proscecutors’ sensitivity and awareness of factors that influence their decisions would result in better-balanced decision-making.Type:journal articleJournal:Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Kriminologie : SZKIssue:2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Zwischen Wahrheit und LügeType:journal articleJournal:Justice - Justiz - Giustizia - die Schweizer RichterzeitungVolume:2012Issue:02/2012 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Familienanwälte zwischen Mandantenwohl und Kindeswohl : Moraldilemmata im Zusammenhang mit dem KindeswohlType:journal articleJournal:Praxis der RechtspsychologieVolume:21Issue:2