The identity politics of qualitative research: A discourse analytic inter-text
Series
Qualitative Psychology Nexus V
Type
book section
Date Issued
2007
Author(s)
Research Team
Alexandria Link
Publikationen
Publikationen
Abstract
We intend this paper to be read as an
inter-text between selected FQS articles, which in
one way or another engage in the identity politics
of qualitative research, and the broader discussion
of quality in the social sciences. Subjecting those
texts to a discursive investigation, we highlight how
the semantic scope of what is called "qualitative
research" is decisively delimited by the positivist
associations of "good research". Our overall aim is
to take issue with two binaries that are commonly
employed by qualitative researchers and thus
collide with the evolution of creative/aesthetic
science. Simultaneously, however, we seek to enliven
qualitative research by providing an (ancient
and thus marginal) understanding of research and
of approaches that are still outside the prevailing
canon. To this end, we start by investigating the
binary between quantitative and qualitative research
that is perpetually reified as our colleagues
invoke the positivist quality criteria, subordinating
the qualitative pole to an inferior position. Second,
we provide examples of the ways that qualitative
research is habitually separated from "nonresearch"
such as the arts, journalism and fiction,
ostensibly to justify calling it "scientific". Pondering
how these binaries endow qualitative research with
a limited identity and a supplementary status, we
draw on some postmodern works so as to elaborate
on alternative understandings of "science" and
scientific quality. Finally, we argue for a "politics of
difference" which we envision as a point of origin
for extending qualitative research by multiplying its
genres, styles and tropes.
inter-text between selected FQS articles, which in
one way or another engage in the identity politics
of qualitative research, and the broader discussion
of quality in the social sciences. Subjecting those
texts to a discursive investigation, we highlight how
the semantic scope of what is called "qualitative
research" is decisively delimited by the positivist
associations of "good research". Our overall aim is
to take issue with two binaries that are commonly
employed by qualitative researchers and thus
collide with the evolution of creative/aesthetic
science. Simultaneously, however, we seek to enliven
qualitative research by providing an (ancient
and thus marginal) understanding of research and
of approaches that are still outside the prevailing
canon. To this end, we start by investigating the
binary between quantitative and qualitative research
that is perpetually reified as our colleagues
invoke the positivist quality criteria, subordinating
the qualitative pole to an inferior position. Second,
we provide examples of the ways that qualitative
research is habitually separated from "nonresearch"
such as the arts, journalism and fiction,
ostensibly to justify calling it "scientific". Pondering
how these binaries endow qualitative research with
a limited identity and a supplementary status, we
draw on some postmodern works so as to elaborate
on alternative understandings of "science" and
scientific quality. Finally, we argue for a "politics of
difference" which we envision as a point of origin
for extending qualitative research by multiplying its
genres, styles and tropes.
Language
English
HSG Classification
contribution to scientific community
Refereed
No
Book title
Generalization in Qualitative Research
Publisher
Ingeborg Huber Verlag
Publisher place
Tübingen
Start page
71
End page
101
Pages
31
Subject(s)
Eprints ID
30716