Repository logo
Research Outputs
Projects
People
Statistics
  1. Home
  2. HSG CRIS
  3. HSG Publications
  4. Proactive behavior in voice assistants: A systematic review and conceptual model
Details

Proactive behavior in voice assistants: A systematic review and conceptual model

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
ISSN
2451-9588
Type
journal article
Date Issued
2024
Author(s)
Caterina Bérubé
;
Marcia Nissen  
;
Rasita Vinay
;
Alexa Geiger
;
Tobias Budig
;
Aashish Bhandari
;
Catherine Rachel Pe Benito
;
Nathan Ibarcena
;
Olivia Pistolese
;
Pan Li
;
Abdullah Bin Sawad
;
Elgar Fleisch  
;
Christoph Stettler
;
Bronwyn Hemsley
;
Shlomo Berkovsky
;
Tobias Kowatsch  
;
A. Baki Kocaballi
DOI
10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100411
Abstract
Voice assistants (VAs) are increasingly integrated into everyday activities and tasks, raising novel challenges for users and researchers. One emergent research direction concerns proactive VAs, who can initiate interaction without direct user input, offering unique benefits including efficiency and natural interaction. Yet, there is a lack of review studies synthesizing the current knowledge on how proactive behavior has been implemented in VAs and under what conditions proactivity has been found more or less suitable. To this end, we conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. We searched for articles in the ACM Digital Library, IEEExplore, and PubMed, and included primary research studies reporting user evaluations of proactive VAs, resulting in 21 studies included for analysis. First, to characterize proactive behavior in VAs we developed a novel conceptual model encompassing context, initiation, and action components: Activity/status emerged as the primary contextual element, direct initiation was more common than indirect initiation, and suggestions were the primary action observed. Second, proactive behavior in VAs was predominantly explored in domestic and in-vehicle contexts, with only safety-critical and emergency situations demonstrating clear benefits for proactivity, compared to mixed findings for other scenarios. The paper concludes with a summary of the prevailing knowledge gaps and potential research avenues.
Language
English
Keywords
Human-agent interaction
Proactivity
Voice assistants
User experience
Systematic review
Refereed
yes
Official URL
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824000447
URL
https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/handle/20.500.14171/119758
Division(s)

MED - School of Medic...

Support
HSG researchers can find instructions here for adding or importing publications (DOI, ORCID). Please send questions to alexandria@unisg.ch

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify