Better than a Bet: Good Reasons for Behavioral and Rational Choice Assumptions in IR Theory
Journal
European Journal of International Relations
ISSN
1354-0661
Type
journal article
Date Issued
2022
Author(s)
Abstract
Behavioral IR is enjoying newfound popularity. Nonetheless, attempts to integrate behavioral research into the larger project of IR theory have proven controversial. Many scholars treat behavioral findings as a trove of plausible ad hoc modifications to rational choice models, thereby lending credence to arguments that behavioral IR is merely
residual, empirical, and hence not theoretical. Others limit their research to cataloging outcomes consistent with the basic tenets of behavioral models. Although this expands the empirical base, it is insufficient for theoretical progress. In this article, I explore
various answers to the question of when rational choice or behavioral assumptions should guide efforts to build IR theory. I argue that no single answer trumps all others. Examining the various conditions under which actors reason highlights the importance of macrofoundations. Macrofoundations condition the effects of microprocesses and help identify relevant scope conditions for both rational choice and behavioral models of decision-making. Examining the various purposes of IR theory also provides answers to the question of when rational or behavioral assumptions are likely to be most useful. Although many behavioral scholars premise the relevance of their findings on claims of empirical realism, I argue that under certain conditions, deductive theorizing on the basis of as-if behavioral assumptions can lead to powerful theories that improve our
understanding of IR and may help decision-makers promote desired ends.
residual, empirical, and hence not theoretical. Others limit their research to cataloging outcomes consistent with the basic tenets of behavioral models. Although this expands the empirical base, it is insufficient for theoretical progress. In this article, I explore
various answers to the question of when rational choice or behavioral assumptions should guide efforts to build IR theory. I argue that no single answer trumps all others. Examining the various conditions under which actors reason highlights the importance of macrofoundations. Macrofoundations condition the effects of microprocesses and help identify relevant scope conditions for both rational choice and behavioral models of decision-making. Examining the various purposes of IR theory also provides answers to the question of when rational or behavioral assumptions are likely to be most useful. Although many behavioral scholars premise the relevance of their findings on claims of empirical realism, I argue that under certain conditions, deductive theorizing on the basis of as-if behavioral assumptions can lead to powerful theories that improve our
understanding of IR and may help decision-makers promote desired ends.
Language
English
Keywords
International Relations
rationality
rational choice
behavioral IR
theoretical assumptions
political psychology
HSG Classification
contribution to scientific community
HSG Profile Area
None
Refereed
Yes
Publisher
Sage
Start page
1
End page
25
Pages
25
Official URL
Eprints ID
269506
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Name
Better than a Bet EJIR.pdf
Size
129.45 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
bf85e0a92ae34b54f328a97c5b350d85