This study investigates the factors influencing the effective use of public sector foresight reports in political decision-making, with a particular focus on the German parliamentary context. Utilizing the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as a theoretical framework, the research examines the perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), attitude towards using (ATU), and behavioral intention to use (BIU) of foresight reports among German parliamentarians. The study extends TAM by incorporating specific contextual factors relevant to foresight in policymaking, such as participative foresight, the organizational setup of foresight units, and the actionability of insights. Through a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) approach, the paper aims to unravel the complex interplay between these factors and their impact on parliamentarians' willingness to integrate foresight reports into their legislative work. The current hypotheses suggest that participative foresight, perceived actionability of reports, and alignment with political ideologies significantly influence the acceptance and use of foresight in policy formulation. However, the data collection is still to be done. This research will contribute to the literature on public management and foresight studies by providing nuanced insights into the success factors and challenges associated with incorporating foresight reports into political decision-making processes. Additionally, the study will offer practical implications for enhancing the impact of foresight activities within the public sector, particularly in terms of report design, dissemination strategies, and stakeholder engagement.