Bernhard Stehle
Title
Dr.
Last Name
Stehle
First name
Bernhard
Email
bernhard.stehle@unisg.ch
Phone
+41 71 224 2477
43 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 43
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Zur Fragmentierung der Haftungskette(Schulthess); Reichle, SebastianType:journal articleJournal:HAVE - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, BGE 145 V 18: (Verzugs-)Zinspflicht in der
beruflichen VorsorgeType:journal articleJournal:Aktuelle Juristische PraxisIssue:11 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Urteilsbesprechung 9C_108/2018: Bundesgericht, II. sozialrechtliche Abteilung, Urteil 9C_108/2018 vom 30. Januar 2019, Stiftung Auffangeinrichtung BVG gegen BVG-Sammelstiftung Swiss Life, Berufliche VorsorgeType:journal articleJournal:AJP Aktuelle Juristische Praxis - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Voraussetzungen der Arzthaftung - Ein Überblick gestützt auf die bundesgerichtliche Rechtsprechung, Arzthaftpflicht 2019Type:journal articleJournal:Arzthaftpflicht 2019, Beiträge zur Tagung vom 22. Oktober 2019 in Luzern - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Der Anwendungsbereich von Art. 15–17 LugÜA client domiciled in France concluded contracts with a Swiss bank over a deposit and several accounts. The contracts were concluded in Geneva. Prior to the conclusion of these contracts, the Bank had not directed its activities to France in terms of Article 15(1)(c) of the Lugano Convention («LC»). It had, however, pursued commercial activities in France within the meaning of Article 15(1)(c) LC, because it had operated establishments there. Several years after the conclusion of the contracts, the bank sued the client in Geneva. In this case, the decisive question was: Are Articles 15–17 LC applicable and should the Bank thus have brought proceedings at the client’s domicile in France (based on Article 16(2) LC)? With regard to CJEU Emrek (C-218/12) the answer is «yes». However, the Swiss Supreme Court confirmed the jurisdiction of the Geneva courts in its decision SCD 142 III 170. This decision provides the opportunity to recall the requirements for the application of Articles 15–17 LC and to reflect on the question whether Article 15(1)(c) LC requires a causal link between the «directing» or «pursuing» of commercial or professional activities to the state of the consumer’s domicile and the conclusion of the contract with that consumer.Type:journal articleJournal:Schweizerische Zeitschrift für internationales und europäisches RechtVolume:27Issue:1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Kritisches zum Recht des VersorgungsschadensType:journal articleJournal:HAVE - Haftung und VersicherungIssue:2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication,