Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    What Should We Know About Politicians' Performance Information Need and Use?
    (International Public Management Network, 2012-10-31) ;
    The question of legislators' use of performance information is crucial, since - among others purposes - data on outputs and outcomes is meant to inform about the performance of public managers, programs as well as organizations, and ultimately to influence the allocation of financial means. Limited empirical evidence on parliamentarians' performance information behavior provides contradictory findings with respect to the extent to which this new kind of data is used. This paper aims to draw an outline of the insights we have about politicians' information need and use in general. It sets a particular focus on the question of how the use of performance information by politicians could be analyzed more systematically in the future by referring to conceptual treatments of earlier periods or allied disciplines. We show how future research could profit by shifting the focus of analysis from the isolated analysis of performance information to the context-bounded politician and her information needs, by considering the political rationale with respect to the information-decision nexus, and by including possibilities of symbolic or strategic types of performance information utilization. Conceiving politicians as need-driven and goal-oriented information users requires a different definition of what data inform about performance. [http://www1.imp.unisg.ch/org/idt/ipmr.nsf/ IPMR]
    Type:
    Journal:
    Volume:
    Issue:
  • Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Do Politicians Matter in Public Sector Management Reform? : Or, What Room to Maneuver Do Public Manageres Have?
    This paper aims at mapping public managers' substantial influence on administrative reforms as a consequence of politicians' missing demand for influence. Since any major public sector management reform is closely linked with changes in the corresponding regulation, we essentially focus on legislative-executive relations and, in particular, on the influence parliamentarians exert on the respective bill. The introduction of a 'New Accounting Model' at the national level of the Swiss federal administration and the total revision of the Financial Budget Act serve as objects of in-depth study. Based on the tradition of policy-oriented legislative research the underlying assumption of the analysis is that parliamentarians' influence on legislation varies according to the content of a specific policy. In order to disclose legislators' rationale to intervene in some aspects of the Financial Budget Act while being indifferent towards other regulations, a content analysis of the parliamentary debate over the draft bill is conducted. By matching every statement with the topic(s) addressed an unbiased picture of the debate is obtained. In addition, the amount of statements devoted to a theme makes it possible to highlight 'debate dominating topics' and infer an issue's relevance for parliamentarians. The analysis shows that topics related to the cornerstones of the reform were of low relevance to legislators. Instead, debate dominating topics inhered politically contestable issues. This, in turn, suggests that public managers enjoy substantial freedom of action concerning managerial realms due to politicians' missing demand for it
    Type: