This item is non-discoverable
Thomas Hajduk
Former Member
14 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 14
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The Model of the Honorable Merchant: Bridging Compliance and Integrity?(Springer, 2017); ; - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Die ISO 26000 als institutionelle Verankerung organisationaler Verantwortung(Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2017-01); ; ; - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Ponimanie i prinjatie različij – ključ k uspešnomu
meždunarodnomu sotrudničestvu(et.al., 2016-01-01); ; ; ; Garaeva, AlsuType:book section - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, OCDE et bonnes pratiques : Une histoire inséparable(Presses De Sciences Po, 2015); - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Corporate social responsibility : individual, institutional, and systemic perspectivesIn this article, we will develop our argument in three steps: In the following section, we will focus on economic theory and the way it deals with aspects regarding the life-world of citizens. We argue that concepts of sustainability need to be linked closely to the life-world of economic actors in order to be practically relevant. The term life-world refers to the values and sense-making processes of individuals, and it is specific to social, cultural, and institutional contexts. We will show that economics as an academic discipline still has a hard time dealing with these issues, which is why we suggest moving on from the classical ‘homo oeconomicus' model towards the concept of a ‘homo culturalis'. The third step of our argument focuses on the level of regulatory policy and its influence on corporate action. Beyond national regulation, modern regulatory policy also includes a wide range of new international modes of regulation, such as voluntary environmental and social standards. In times of intensifying global competition, such standards offer normative orientation when it comes to corporate responsibility. Therefore, they should be considered to be important stepping stones on our way towards a civilized market economy.Type:book section - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Bei Friedman nichts Neues : Anmerkungen zu einem falsch verstandenen Klassiker der CSR-DiskussionType:book sectionVolume:567 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Die institutionelle Verankerung organisationaler Verantwortung : Überlegungen zur DIN ISO 26000 aus Sicht der Wissenschaft(Beuth, 2014); ; ; - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Intersectoral Cooperation in the Food Industry(Hampp, 2014); ; ; ; Vorbohle, KristinType:book sectionVolume:1. Aufl. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, A Code to Bind Them All : The Multinational Dilemma and the Endeavour for an International Code of ConductThe post-war period saw the rise of the multinational enterprise (MNE). This new phenomenon drew increasing attention from academia, trade unions, governments and the wider public, often evoking fears about seemingly powerful businesses operating across countries and beyond control. Against the background of these impressions and more general crises (e.g., oil shock, inflation and rising unemployment), international organisations like the United Nations (UN), the International Labour Organization (ILO) and the Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) launched comprehensive inquiries to grasp the nature of the new phenomenon. The ensuing reports concluded that MNEs were neither good nor bad per se but constituted a dilemma. They could be instrumental in promoting economic and social development, while at the same time they could abuse their powers in fields such as taxation, employment and their relations to foreign governments. The UN reports recommended the creation of a code of conduct which would stress the positive role and put a check on corporate misbehaviour. The UN was the first to pursue such a code but was soon torn between the diverging views of developed and developing countries. The OECD, which at the beginning of the debate had been reluctant towards a code, stepped in and adopted the 1976 Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the first code of conduct to emerge. The Guidelines were the result of an internal trade-off: minimum ethical standards for MNEs in turn for investment-friendly government responsibilities. The UN negotiations, by contrast, dragged on and were abandoned by the early 1990s. Nevertheless, the MNE dilemma and the code debate established or "codified" the very idea that MNEs had moral responsibilities vis-Ã -vis government and society. This idea has survived until the late 1990s and 2000s when another wave of international standards of corporate conduct-now called corporate social responsibility (CSR)-emerged.Type:book sectionIssue:Bd. 8