Logo des Repositoriums
menu.section.explore_researchoutputs
Projects
menu.section.explore_researcherprofiles
Statistiken
  1. Startseite
  2. HSG CRIS
  3. HSG Publications
  4. Albatross, Colibri or Eagle? How National Differences in Policy Implementation Shape the Potential of Renewable Energy Communities
Details

Albatross, Colibri or Eagle? How National Differences in Policy Implementation Shape the Potential of Renewable Energy Communities

Type
conference poster
Date Issued
2026-09-08
Author(s)
Norman Fauster  
Abstract
Overview
Renewable energy communities (RECs) enable to share renewable energy directly among a group of consumers, producers, prosumers, and storage systems. Despite the framework set by the Renewable Energy Directive REDII (Directive (EU) 2018/2001, 2018) and the Electricity Market Directive EMD (Directive (EU) 2019/944, 2024), European states differ considerably in how they adopt and implement RECs. We need to understand those differences and their origins so that scholars and policymakers can draw lessons from cross-country comparisons. Researchers have identified diverse REC concepts (Dudka et al., 2023) and the varying development across Europe (Inês et al., 2020; Neij et al., 2025). Yet, the mechanisms driving country-specific implementation choices remain insufficiently understood.
This paper asks: Why do national legislation and political perspectives on RECs differ between countries operating under similar regulatory frameworks? Using a qualitative inductive approach, we analyse documents of the legislative process involving stakeholders and interest groups in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. These countries share a comparable economic and regulatory context, with Switzerland also being subjected and influenced by EU-level policy and markets. Still, the countries diverge in their progress of REC implementation. At one end of the spectrum, we find Austrian legislators advocating RECs, stimulating participatory projects, and thus advancing social acceptance. At the other end, German legislation emphasises potential pain points due to RECs’ complexity and potential for litigation. We conclude between-country differences to be rooted in a country-specific mix of justification applied by stakeholders and the interested public. Our work thus advances the understanding of how diverse REC policies and perceptions are shaped and how they influence the potential of RECs.
Keywords
renewable energy communities
energy transition
renewable energy
policy analysis
HSG Classification
contribution to scientific community
Refereed
Yes
Event Title
19th IAEE European Conference
Event Location
Munich, Germany
Event Date
September 6–10, 2026
URL
https://alexandria.unisg.ch/handle/20.500.14171/137448
Subject(s)

social sciences

political science

responsibility and su...

other research area

Division(s)

RISE - Institute of R...

File(s)
Vorschaubild

open.access

cris-layout.advanced-attachment.dc.title

20260904 Poster Fauster REC IAEE.pdf

cris-layout.advanced-attachment.size

2.2 MB

cris-layout.advanced-attachment.format

Adobe PDF

cris-layout.advanced-attachment.checksum (MD5)

c461200f806b1add726998b6f92c128a

Vorschaubild

open.access

cris-layout.advanced-attachment.dc.title

Fauster(2026)-Abstract_Implementation_RECs.pdf

cris-layout.advanced-attachment.size

110.87 KB

cris-layout.advanced-attachment.format

Adobe PDF

cris-layout.advanced-attachment.checksum (MD5)

e762f8bb134fc006f5a283a130adce5c

Hilfe
HSG-Forschende finden hier Anleitungen zum Erfassen, DOI- und ORCID-Import usw. Bei Fragen wenden Sie sich an alexandria@unisg.ch

footer.built-with footer.link.dspace-cris footer.extension-by footer.link.4science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Datenschutzbestimmungen
  • Endnutzervereinbarung
  • Feedback schicken
Logo des Repositoriums COAR Notify